While the
report's observations are helpful I can't help thinking that the core reason
for the poor proportions was underplayed. Surely the key factor is that the
number of women coming into the STEM professions in the first place is
unacceptably low. Professor Ann Dowling, head of the Department of Engineering
at Cambridge University (and soon to be President of the Royal Academy of
Engineering) recently highlighted with incredulity that only 17% of engineering
students in the UK were women and gender
balance among students in the other STEM disciplines is variously adverse. No
matter how the STEM career paths of women are smoothed, proportions cannot be
significantly improved if they have not entered these professions in the first
place.
A much stronger focus is needed on
engaging female pupils at primary and secondary school with the excitement and
benefits of STEM careers - not just because it is the right thing to do, but
because if the proportion of girls entering STEM careers were increased to the
same level as that of boys, UK industry's increasingly evident STEM skills gap
problem could be significantly reduced.
So what are the steps that can be
taken to get girls to follow STEM careers? I would highlight a number of major
factors.
1) Perceptions and attitudes. From
an early age too many girls are still told that STEM subjects are masculine
subjects that they won't enjoy, and lead to careers which aren't suitable for
women. These attitudes can still be a subtext in the media, but in particular
can be prevalent within families where parental prejudices are generally
reinforced to the children, resulting in the perpetuation of bias from
generation to generation. Action needs to be taken to break the cycle.
2) Career insight. The opportunity
for young people at school, and particularly girls, to get an insight into a
STEM career can be very small. The careers that are visible in the media
generally revolve around the entertainment and media industries and the lack of
insight into alternative careers provides a blockage to progress in STEM.
3) Role models. Similarly role
models are important in inspiring young people into careers. If they don't have
access to scientists and engineers in real life there is a danger that they are
stuck with popular stereotypes (scientists are geeks with glasses and mad hair,
engineers have dirty hands and faces and work on cars), which do nothing to
encourage them into STEM industries.
4) Special support. Because of the
prejudice affecting women aspiring to STEM disciplines young female students
often need special support to develop the soft skills that will give them the
confidence to pursue STEM careers against the odds.
5) Careers advice. Laments about the
careers advice available to students are common but in the absence of a clear
focus to revolutionise this advice it is necessary for such advice to be
delivered to students, and particularly girls, in other ways.
This is a lengthy list but it is not
insuperable. My organisation, the education charity EDT, works alongside others
to tackle many of these issues, both to inspire students into STEM careers in
general and in various ways to help improve the proportion of girls entering
these careers.
In recent years EDT has reinforced
its focus on encouraging women into STEM professions, led by Estelle Rowe MBE,
an acknowledged expert in the subject. As part of this focus we have innovated
in three areas to supplement our core delivery of curriculum enrichment
activities which provide students with STEM career insights and role models.
Firstly recognising the key effect
that parental attitudes have on the career routes of their children, we have
started working with schools to deliver the "STEM Family Challenge"
which is designed to encourage parent involvement in STEM choices and to inform
and highlight to them the benefits of STEM careers. This is particularly
important for girls where parental acknowledgement and enthusiasm about STEM
career opportunities will be important in encouraging them beyond the
negativity that they will undoubtedly experience elsewhere.
Secondly, we have initiated female
only programmes where we teach soft skills, such as personal organisation,
research and revision techniques, presentation and report writing skills, and
project management and team working skills, to girls wanting to embark on STEM
careers. This programme called Inspire is about giving girls the confidence and
the tools they will need to make headway in environments which at times will
seem adverse to them. Similarly we run an all female programme called Insight
for girls who are thinking of studying science and engineering at Higher
Education level.
Finally we have initiated a
programme called 'Routes into STEM', which is designed to supplement the
careers advice available to students relatively early in their school careers,
around Year 10 (S3). A three day activity allows students to see higher
education, further education and company STEM career environments helping them
to compare apprentice and undergraduate routes into STEM activities as well as
receiving careers advice on the options within the STEM environment. While this
activity is for both boys and girls it is particularly helpful in allowing
girls to understand their options in science and engineering careers.
It is becoming increasingly clear
that if we are to make a substantive change in the proportions of girls
entering STEM careers from school we have to provide them with focused support
in all these areas throughout their school careers and particularly at
secondary school. We need to work to inform, not just them but also their families,
about the positive opportunities in STEM; we need to provide them with the
career insights and role models that will inspire them in their studies; we
need to provide them with special support in the areas of confidence and soft
skills to help them overcome bias and resistance and we need to give them clear
sign-posting on the alternative routes that are available into STEM careers.
Not all these areas are well supported at the moment and there are still too
many in UK industry who think it is government's job to deliver them with the
skilled workers they need through the education system.
The truth is that UK industry is
responsible for its own talent pipeline and with the support of government it
needs to 'up its game' in attracting girls into STEM by delivering the full
range of the type of initiatives I have outlined. These need to be delivered
consistently throughout at least secondary education and delivered across both
the state and independent sectors. Time has already run out for talking about
solving the skills crisis; decisive action on encouraging girls into STEM
careers will be a major step in ensuring that the UK doesn't miss the boat when
it comes to planning for future science and engineering skills.
Follow Dr Gordon
Mizner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheEDTUK
I would love to indulge in my passion as a career, but then the sustainability to me doesn't make sense. If I can get a job where I can sustain my passion outside of work, whilst being able to sustain myself, I don't see why not.
ReplyDeletesuccess with good planning